Une merveille

   https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/lucernae/90/product/octavian_3534_bc__silver_denarius_363_g_20_mm_mint_moving_with_octavian_36_bc_facade_of_the_roman_curia_with_a_tetrastyle_porch_imp_caesar/893388/Default.aspx

Une merveille, pas d'autre mot !

La même en lien direct à cliquer :

https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/lucernae/90/product/octavian_3534_bc__silver_denarius_363_g_20_mm_mint_moving_with_octavian_36_bc_facade_of_the_roman_curia_with_a_tetrastyle_porch_imp_caesar/893388/Default.aspx

Oulala ...

Magnifique !
Elle irait bien avec celle ci :


Octavian, Denarius
Italian mint, possibly Rome, 31-30 BC
Anepigraph, bare head of Octavian left
CAESAR - DIVI F, Victory standing right on globe, holding wreath
3.84 gr
Ref : HCRI # 408, RCV # 1552v, Cohen # 66, RIC # 255
The following comment is taken from CNG, sale 84 # 957 :
"Following his victory at Actium, Octavian ordered a golden statue of Victory, standing on a globe and holding a wreath and palm, to be set up on an altar in the Curia in Rome. This statue had been captured by the Romans from Pyrrhus in 272 BC, and it assumed a somewhat tutelary mystique, protecting the Roman state from dissolution. In AD 382, the emperor Gratian ordered its removal. Two years later, the senator and orator Symmachus urged Valentinian II to replace it, a request that was met with stiff opposition from the bishop of Milan, Ambrose. Though it was briefly returned to its place by the usurper Eugenius, it was again removed following his defeat. Petitions to Theodosius I for its subsequent replacement were refused, on grounds that the once-important symbol of the gods’ blessing on the Roman Empire was now nothing more than a piece of paganism"

qui est à toi je présume ...

Yes sir !
C'est pour ça qu'elles iraient bien ensemble

je te la laisse alors ....

par contre le prix est de mon point de vu trop élevé (le vendeur serait sympa de proposer 30 à 40% de rabais).
si je voulais vraiment jouer les chieurs je pourrai faire comme remarque que la monnaie est légèrement décentré au revers et qu'il manque donc un élément important de l'iconographie